Visayan Civil Society
Organizations Meet, Give Recommendations for ASEAN Human
Rights Body

Workshop groups discuss grassroot concerns for the ASEAN
human rights body.
Human rights organizations, Church groups, party- lists,
and other grass roots-based groups from the Visayas in
the Philippines gathered in Cebu City on July 31, 2008
to contribute their recommendations for the proposed human
rights body of the Association
of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). The activity was
organized by the Philippine Working Group for an ASEAN
Human Rights Mechanism (PWG) and two of its member organizations,
the Task Force Detainees
of the Philippines (TFDP) and the Philippine
Alliance of Human Rights Advocates (PAHRA).
WG Secretary-General Carlos Medina Jr. started the discussion
by giving an overview of how the Working Group came to
be and the significance of the current developments in
ASEAN. He spoke of the advantages of having an intergovernmental
human rights body in Southeast Asia, describing in detail
the civil society push that went as far back as 1993 for
such a body, and highlighted the importance of having
CSO input. He called the PWG national consultations an
opportunity to do so because results will be officially
received and considered by Ambassador Rosario Manalo,
the Philippine representative to the high
level panel (HLP) formed by ASEAN to draft the powers
and mandates of the AHRB.
Ray Paolo Santiago, program manager of the Working Group,
then gave a presentation on ASEAN, the ASEAN
Charter and its human rights provisions, existing
regional human rights mechanisms, the impact of the AHRB
on ASEAN peoples, and the role of CSOs in pushing for
the AHRB.
Discussions then followed on the AHRB, its ideal relationship
with CSOs, and proposed structure and functions. Participants
agreed that the AHRB must focus on all civil, cultural,
economic, and political rights. To be effective, they
believed that the AHRB should have program for priority
sectors (i.e. indigenous peoples, migrant workers, etc)
and consider the establishment of a regional human rights
court. Participants also wanted the AHRB to regularly
consult with CSOs, national human rights institutions,
and other groups in the region which specializes in human
rights. A final suggestion was to have the AHRB staffed
by an equal number of representatives of governments and
CSOs from all ten ASEAN member-states.
PAHRA Chair Max de Mesa summarized the consultation by
explaining how important strong civilian resolve for the
AHRB and in ASEAN can lead to a decrease in human rights
violations in the region. He said that the CSO advancements
for human rights in the region was substantial and encouraged
participants to push for their aspirations for the AHRB,
“whatever the results may be”.
The PWG consultation with CSOs in Cebu City is the second
in a series of consultations in the Philippines. It will
be holding another consultation in Cagayan de Oro City
for CSOs based in the island of Mindanao on August 30,
2008 before consolidating the nationwide results in the
final consultation in Metro Manila.